To keep things simple, I’ll only look at SNMPv1 and SNMPv2c in this article. Much of this security relies on limiting the use of SNMP to read-only and using tools such as iptables to limit where incoming SNMP requests can source from. At some point, you have to drop down to SNMPv2c or SNMPv1, and then you’re back to the "in the clear" issue.ĭespite the security shortcomings, SNMP can still be used without compromising the security of your server or network. However, not all devices support SNMPv3, and thus interoperability becomes an issue. This fact gives the attacker access to valuable information on your devices, and even the ability to make changes if write access is enabled.īut wait, you may be thinking, what about SNMPv3? And you’re right, SNMPv3 can be more secure by using authentication and encryption. An attacker can simply listen on the wire and grab the community as it passes by. The problem, however, is that SNMPv1 and SNMPv2c are unencrypted: Even the community string used to "authenticate" is sent in the clear. This situation is likely because of SNMPv1's simplicity, and that it’s often used inside of the network and not exposed to the outside world. SNMPv1 is by far the most popular flavor, despite being considered obsolete due to a complete lack of discernible security. There are three primary flavors of SNMP: SNMPv1, SNMPv2c, and SNMPv3. Linux system administration skills assessment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |